Sunday, March 17, 2013

                                                            Gun control/rights in the US

Gun rights and gun control groups alike have been lobbying Congress for decades to craft legislation in their respective favors. In the past years the gun issue has reached the nation’s highest court more than ever.
Gun control believers want you to believe that if all guns were outlawed then there would be no crime. Gun rights believers want you to understand that it is your constitutional right to own a gun, and it might save your life .



I think that Guns, like other weapons, though more deadly and possibly more convenient to use, are still inanimate objects and are not the cause of violence or killings. They are not responsible for mass shootings like Virginia Tech, Connecticut, etc... People kill not guns. The main problem is about laws, and the illegal sell of guns. 
More than 90% of guns used in gun crime were obtained through illegal means such as stealing or the black market. If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

Also the major piece of gun control  is legislation , the U.S. Code was the assault weapons ban, which passed in 1994 as part of a larger crime bill passed by Congress and signed by then-President Bill Clinton. The ban applied to the manufacture of 19 specific models of semi-automatic firearms and to other guns with assault-weapons features. But the ban expired in 2004, and repeated attempts to renew it have failed.

 Democrats believed their support for the assault weapons ban cost them control of Congress in the 1994 mid-term elections. Whether that's true or not, there's little question that the politics of gun ownership have swung to the right. Republicans largely oppose gun control, and Democrats are split, with some lawmakers cautious about going against the views of more conservative constituencies, especially in rural districts. And in 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in, striking down Washington, D.C.'s blanket ban on handgun ownership in a case known as District of Columbia v. Heller. The ruling established that the Second Amendment to the Constitution -- "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" -- means that individuals, and not just the police and military, may own guns.


Money ,and power also control guns , Gun rights groups have given more than $30 million in individual, PAC and soft money contributions to federal candidates and party committees since 1989, with nearly $27 million -- or 87% -- of it going to Republicans. And in the 2010 and 2012 election cycles, they let loose another $41.2 million (at least) in outside spending, almost all of which has put Democrats in their cross hairs  The NRA has provided the lion's share of the funds, having contributed more than $21 million since '89 and further opening its coffers to make $25 million in outside expenditures.
Gun control groups, by comparison, have been barely a blip on the radar screen. They've given a total of just under $2 million since 1989, of which 94 percent has gone to Democrats. In the 2012 election cycle, they gave only $5,000.
Obama needs to enforce the guns control laws ,the existing background check system fails 99.91% of the time, and isn't a deterrent to gun violence at all.  If fraud and deception occur at a higher rate than 62 out of 72,600, then rather than add to the number of background checks, we should first ask why the Department of Justice didn't pursue more than 44 prosecutions, which is a worse rate of .0606% of all rejected applications.

“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, and the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron.” 

1 comment:

  1. Jalila,

    Good post. I enjoy reading your posts, because I learn from them, with all of the facts and figures that you include. That's what makes a strong case.

    Your writing is excellent.

    The only suggestion I have this week, is that you make your view stand out more. For instance, at the end of the post, just before the quote from Eisenhower (which is a nice touch), you should have a short, concluding paragraph that states your opinion.

    I can recall from earlier in the post, that you don't blame guns and that you think laws should be better enforced. Be sure to restate this at the end, so that your reader comes away from the article with your final message. You are teaching the reader, so be sure to sum up what you want them to grasp at the end.

    Overall, excellent work. Try to make these changes next time.


    GR: 93

    ReplyDelete